‘I Told You So’: De La Hoya’s Glorification Of Crawford’s Success Falls brief To Acknowledge A Close Battle

Marketer Oscar De La Hoya celebrated today, giving the old “I informed you so” regarding Canelo Alvarez’s loss to Terence Crawford last Saturday evening at Allegiant Arena inLas Las Vega

A Misdirected Triumph Lap

De La Hoya clarified that he had really anticipated that Canelo (63 – 3 – 2, 39 KOs) would absolutely drop the battle, and he saw it as a discriminative event with Crawford (42 -0, 31 KOs) messing around the super star all evening. It plainly had actually not been in this manner whatsoever.

Crawford rarely won a 12 -rounded consentaneous choice and would absolutely have actually shed if Canelo had not gassed out in the last 3 rounds. I had it acquired as a draw.

“I informed you so. I forecasted the Canelo-Crawford fight like a foreteller. Canelo’s feet were sealed on the canvas, and he was striking air,” asserted marketing professional Oscar De La Hoya throughout today’s Slap Back Thursday’s version , celebrating relating to Canelo Alvarez’s loss to Terence Crawford lastSaturday

A ‘Tom and Jerry’ Battle

Canelo regularly pressed the strike on Crawford, that simply abided by the William Scull plan of circling around the ring for 3 mins of each round, throwing periodic strikes. Alvarez’s feet were not “sealed to the canvas,” as De La Hoya wrongly claims. He was constantly striking Crawford, which required activity as an outcome of the fight being a Tom and Jerry- kind fight

Turki Alalshikh desired blood, trashed faces, and harmed. Rather, he obtained a Jerry- esque performance from Crawford and possibly misused the $ 50 million that he paid him.

The ‘Antique’ Design of Crawford

Alalshikh would certainly have acquired a lot more worth for the cash he spent if he had actually utilized Christian Mbilli, David Benavidez, Sebastian Fundora, or Jaron ‘Boots’ Ennis as the opposition for Canelo to battle in contrast toCrawford

Canelo-Crawford was an actually, exceptionally boring battle lastSaturday It simply demonstrates how marketers can get it wrong by paying excessive with a dated, retro Mayweather style that does not match this period, where you require to thrill followers or be neglected. I watch Crawford’s design as a relic from the Mayweather duration that does not match the showing off task today, where rivals have to be all activity and have a technique to offer themselves.

“He simply had fun with Canelo, made him look silly. Prior to you begin with your [stuff] concerning Canelo being old, just know that Crawford is older. That’s not a reason below. [Crawford just] toyed with him. Even Mayweather understood Crawford was going to institution him. He put $ 50, 000 on Crawford,” assertedDe La Hoya

Oscar is overlooking a variety of factors.

1. Canelo-Crawford was a close figh t. Crawford really did not mess around or university Alvarez lastSaturday He mainly struck and competed 12 rounds. It was simply in rounded 9 that Bud battled boldy quickly. The rest of the battle was movement. The ratings were 115 – 113, 115 – 113, and 116 – 112 Those are not the kind of ratings that an individual sees in an inequitable battle.
2. Alvarez’s impressive go back to: Crawford, 37, is 2 years older than the 35 -year-old Canelo, nonetheless he has really run into none of the elite-level rivals that Alvarez has. Terence truly did not soak up fine considering that he was a lot less dangerous punchers in the 135, 140, 147, and 154 -extra pound divisions than the ones managed at 160, 168, and 175

Canelo’s finest resistance

Gennadiy Golovkin x 3
Dmitry Bivol
Miguel Cotto
Daniel Jacobs
Shane Mosley
Floyd Mayweather Jr
Austin Trout
Kermit Cintron
Erislandy Lara
Caleb Plant
Jermell Charlo
Callum Smith
Sergey Kovalev
Jaime Munguia